LUKE 14:26:
HATE OR HYPERBOLE?
This article first appeared in the Practical Hermeneutics column
of the Christian Research
Journal, volume 27, number 5
(2004). For further information or to subscribe to the Christian Research Journal go to: http://www.equip.org
My initiation into the misinterpretation of hyperbole occurred
half-a-century ago when I sat listening as an adolescent to a Christian radio
program in my family’s farmhouse in Iowa .
The speaker’s text was Jesus’ statement that “if you have faith like a grain of
mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it
will move, and nothing will be impossible for you” (Matt. 17:20).1 The preacher
began, “Now let me say right from the start that I believe that the mountains
of which Jesus is speaking are spiritual and psychological mountains.”
Anyone who has prayed for something as Jesus describes and not
seen it performed knows that the literal interpretation of His statement is
faulty. A strained “spiritual” interpretation, however, is not the only alternative.
By the time I had completed my literary education, I had learned about a figure
of speech called hyperbole that provides another way of understanding such exaggerated
statements. The evidence is abundant, however, that critics of Christianity and
some Christians do not place much stock in hyperbole.
Should We Hate Our Family? In this
article, I want to pay particular attention to Jesus’ statement in Luke 14:26: “If
anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and
children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my
disciple.” One way to misinterpret this verse is to take it literally. Cults
often operate on the premise that the statement is literally true — that it
pits loyalty to the group against love for family. In doing so, they attempt to
distance followers from family members who might make them fall away. Critics
of Christianity in turn point to the verse in order to denigrate the Christian
faith. An atheist, for example, quotes the verse as “a perfect illustration of
how a cult operates. Sort of makes you wonder about all those conservative
religionists that preach ‘traditional family values!’”2 A deist scolds
Christians who do not interpret the verse literally. After noting that Luke chose the
Greek word meaning “hate” and not another word meaning “love less,” this person
writes, “All you are attempting here is to explain away an uncomfortable
teaching because you cannot live up to it; in effect, you do not really believe
it.”3
Someone who calls himself a satanist castigates Christianity on
the ground that, in light of Jesus’
statement, “one must question Christ’s idea of the family.”4 One
final aberration needs to be added to the mix. A gnostic source asserts that
early Assyrian churches took Jesus’ statement to mean that only celibate men
could become Christians.5 A
Way out of the Maze. It
is obvious that a literal interpretation of Jesus’ statement leads to
disastrous results; but what is the
alternative to interpreting it literally? The only viable option is to regard
the
statement as being a hyperbole— a conscious exaggeration that expresses truth in a nonliteral
manner. It apparently is not easy for people to label a statement as being a
hyperbole. On the surface, it may seem to signal a lack of faith when we do not
take the great promises of Scripture at face value. After all, “all things are
possible with God” (Mark 10:27). Interpreting hyperbolic statements literally,
however, lands us in much greater difficulties than interpreting them
figuratively does.
CRI Web: www.equip.org
Tel: 704.887.8200 Fax: 704.887.8299
2
Hyperbole in the Bible. The starting point for
reestablishing hyperbole as a genuine conveyer of truth is to note how often it
appears in the Bible: “By my God I can leap over a wall” (Ps. 18:29); “I beat
[my enemies] fine as dust before the wind” (Ps. 18:42); “A thousand may fall at
your side, ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you” (Ps.
91:7); “You are all together beautiful, my love; there is no flaw in you” (Song
4:7); The wicked “cannot sleep unless they have done wrong; they are robbed of sleep
unless they have made someone stumble” (Prov. 4:16). If we are still in doubt
that hyperbole is a legitimate way to express truth, we can turn to the example
of Jesus. Elton Trueblood shows in his book The Humor of Christ that the most distinctive
feature of Jesus’ discourses is their use of exaggeration — the preposterous
overstatement in the mode of “our conventional Texas story, which no one
believes literally, but which everyone remembers.”6 G. K. Chesterton notes that
“Christ had even a literary style of his own.…The diction used by Christ is quite
curiously gigantesque; it is full of camels leaping through needles and
mountains hurled into the sea.”7 This is, in fact, accurate; for example: “When
you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is
doing” (Matt. 6:3); “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle
than for a
rich person to enter the kingdom
of God ” (Matt. 19:24); The kingdom of
God “is like a grain of mustard seed that a man took and sowed in his garden,
and it grew and became a tree, and the birds of the air made nests in its
branches” (Luke 13:19). If we realize how frequently hyperbole is used in the
Bible, we can avoid being timid when we come upon examples of it. It takes a
certain amount of courage to stake one’s claim that Jesus’ statement about hating
one’s family is an exaggeration. We need to understand, however, that no matter
how we
interpret
the statement, we are engaging in interpretation; to claim that
Jesus is telling us literally to hate our family is no less daring than to
decide that He is exaggerating.
How Hyperbole Works. If the biblical writers and Jesus Himself did not hesitate to use hyperbole, we should not be intimidated when we encounter it; but three questions need to be answered: How can we tell when a statement is hyperbolic? The test is easy: whenever a statement cannot be literally true in the way or to the degree to which the statement claims, it must be exaggerated; for example: “You will tread on the lion and the adder” (Ps. 91:13); “How can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take out the speck that is in your eye,’ when you yourself do not see the log that is in your own eye?” (Luke 6:42). We know that people generally do not literally trample on lions and snakes, just as it is highly unlikely for a person literally to have a log in his or her eye — and not notice it! We know that a statement is an exaggeration when the literal interpretation violates our common sense logic and observation of how things generally operate. Why do speakers and writers use overstatement? They speak hyperbolically for the same reason we do. We might say, for example, “I wrote on that ridiculous test until my arm fell off,” or, “Everyone agrees that this teacher is unfair.” The general principle is that hyperbole expresses emotional truth rather than literal truth. The examples cited above express feelings of exasperation and outrage. Hyperbole can also express extreme conviction. The psalmist, for example, wrote, “One thing have I asked of the Lord…” (Ps. 27:4). We know that in fact David asked many things of the Lord; but he exalted his desire to worship God to the status of his only request in order to signal his conviction that asking for the ability and desire to worship God is the most important request that one can make. Hyperbole is also a way of grabbing a reader’s or listener’s attention. Whenever a truth is in danger of
How Hyperbole Works. If the biblical writers and Jesus Himself did not hesitate to use hyperbole, we should not be intimidated when we encounter it; but three questions need to be answered: How can we tell when a statement is hyperbolic? The test is easy: whenever a statement cannot be literally true in the way or to the degree to which the statement claims, it must be exaggerated; for example: “You will tread on the lion and the adder” (Ps. 91:13); “How can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take out the speck that is in your eye,’ when you yourself do not see the log that is in your own eye?” (Luke 6:42). We know that people generally do not literally trample on lions and snakes, just as it is highly unlikely for a person literally to have a log in his or her eye — and not notice it! We know that a statement is an exaggeration when the literal interpretation violates our common sense logic and observation of how things generally operate. Why do speakers and writers use overstatement? They speak hyperbolically for the same reason we do. We might say, for example, “I wrote on that ridiculous test until my arm fell off,” or, “Everyone agrees that this teacher is unfair.” The general principle is that hyperbole expresses emotional truth rather than literal truth. The examples cited above express feelings of exasperation and outrage. Hyperbole can also express extreme conviction. The psalmist, for example, wrote, “One thing have I asked of the Lord…” (Ps. 27:4). We know that in fact David asked many things of the Lord; but he exalted his desire to worship God to the status of his only request in order to signal his conviction that asking for the ability and desire to worship God is the most important request that one can make. Hyperbole is also a way of grabbing a reader’s or listener’s attention. Whenever a truth is in danger of
becoming a cliché, the use of hyperbole can rescue it from
indifference (or what J. R. R. Tolkien called “the drab blur of triteness or
familiarity”8). It often does so by producing a shock effect. This seems to be the
purpose for many of Jesus’ hyperboles: “If your right eye causes you to sin,
tear it out and throw it away” (Matt. 5:29); “Follow me, and leave the dead to
bury their own dead” (Matt. 8:22). How do we extract
a literal principle of truth from a hyperbole? We need to scale back the element of exaggeration in a hyperbole
and then infer the principle that remains. Jesus does not want us literally to CRI Web: www.equip.org
Tel: 704.887.8200 Fax: 704.887.8299
3
hate our family members and ourselves in order to follow Him. If
we put the exaggerated element in the statement into the background, we are
left with the principle that devotion to Christ is the most important
relationship that we can have, and that it must take precedence over all human
relationships. The element of exaggeration represented by the verb hate exists to express the
heightened conviction and passion with which Jesus made the statement.
— Leland Ryken
NOTES
1. All Bible quotations are from the English Standard Version.
2. Jon Nelson, “An Irreverent Look at the Bible,” The Atheist
Alliance Web Center, http://www.atheistalliance.org/library/nelsonirreverant_
bible.html.
3. Reverend Peter, “Why Christainity [sic] Fails,” Deism: Belief
in God Without the Baggage, MSN Groups,
http://groups.msn.com/DEISMbeliefinGodwithoutthebaggage/whychristainityfails1.msnw.
4. “Morality And Paradoxes,” Satan2000.com,
http://www.satan2000.com/christians/moralityparadoxes.htm#hate-your-family.
5. J. S. Chiappalone, Annwn News, December 1997,
http://www.fortunecity.com/roswell/prophecy/23/News/Dec97.htm.
6. Elton Trueblood, The Humor of
Christ (New York: Harper and Row, 1964), 47–48.
7. G. K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy (Garden City, NY: Image Books, 1959), 146. For a full scholarly
treatment of hyperbole in Jesus’
sayings, see Robert H. Stein, Difficult Sayings in the Gospels; Jesus’ Use of Overstatement and
Hyperbole (Grand
Rapids : Baker,
1985), which offers 13 criteria for assessing hyperbole, discusses
the functions of hyperbole, and surveys examples of hyperbole
in Scripture.
8. J. R. R. Tolkien, “On Fairy-Stories,” in Essays Presented to Charles Williams, ed. C. S. Lewis (Grand
Rapids : William B. Eerdmans,
1966), 74.
No comments:
Post a Comment